The Photographic Community for the Four Thirds Photographer
|
One of all
Copyright ©2005, Horst Schmier HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
As Iīm waiting for my 7-14 (seems to be some delivery trouble by olympus) I try this vertical pano.
Itīs maybe technically not well (shot out of hand without tripod) and the distance to the object may be also critical for technically perfection. But I believe itīs a nice try to show a tree from this angel in full dimension, isnīt it?
| Photographer: | Horst Schmier HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ |
|---|---|
| Folder: | Horst Schmier |
| Uploaded: | 2005-May-31 19:28 EDT |
| Current Rating: | 7.20/5 (Weighted rating: 7.55) View all ratings Delete my rating |
| Copying allowed: | No |
| Camera: | Olympus E-1 |
| Lens: | Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 |
| Lens Adapter: | None |
| ISO: | 100 |
| Aperture: | f/3.5 |
| Shutter Speed: | 1/320 |
| Focal Length: | 14 |
| Flash: | No |
| Tripod/Monopod: | No |
| Critique Level: | Dead Honest Critique |
|
|
Help support MyFourThirds by purchasing Four Thirds equipment on Amazon.com. Click here!
|
PLEASE SUPPORT MYFOURTHIRDS
|
| MFT Time 06:47 May 21 2013 |
|
| Toronto contractor |
NO SUBJECT
It is a nice try Horst. What software did you use to this? I just had a friend showing me how to do it with photomerge in PSCS with amazing results... he did point out that it may be better to try with longer focal lengths and so avoid the distortion that the shorther ones give. Myabe that would have helped here. Nonetheless I do like it, and makes me think of similar techniques myself.
Best wishes- Andy
Andrew McLean HoF ♥ ¤ $ at 21:10 EDT on 2005-May-31 [Reply]
Interesting photo
Looks OK to me, Horst, though I'm not a fan of extreme vertical panos. I think you've made it difficult to appreciate because it's too big even for my monitor (running at 1600x1200 pixels). I like the foreground pool of light.
Rob Smith HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 00:01 EDT on 2005-Jun-01 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
good one. well done. i tried several times a (architectural) vertical pano without luck. who wonders: without tripod and panohead its nearly impossible to shoot architectural panos. will try it with more seriousness next...
michael hoefner HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 03:39 EDT on 2005-Jun-01 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
I think you captured it well, but as Rob said it is too big for my monitor. the green is much richer in Photoshop. No embedded profile!
Frank Brault ♥ ¤ $ at 11:00 EDT on 2005-Jun-01 [Reply]
Thanks ...
to you all for your kindly comments.
@Andy The software is a german shareware tool from Tobias Hüllmandel http://www.tshsoft.de/index.html that was tested in the german Computer Magazin cīt 09/2005 and has a price about 35. With technically problems have I tried to point to problems with overlapping. The distortionis in this case, tree in wood, not architectural, is a fact of art wich I like.
@ All Iīve thought about to size down the pano to about screen size. But I decided to do it not. In real nature you canīt see this tree at once from this distance. So you have also to scroll your eys up and down and you can see also only a crop.
Like John I also enjoying to scroll in panos and find for myself maybe a crop that I like mostly.
Hope you can understand this sort of english.
Horst Schmier HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 12:44 EDT on 2005-Jun-01 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
I like these kind of format and think that is good idea and your choice to do that with tree...looks little bit strange these green color on the top of the tree...But I shoot recently one series in the forest very similar to this yours,and learn that is very hard to achieve a proper exp.value in the forest with usualy tracks of light behind the trees.
denis grzetic HoF Win ♥ ¤ at 13:14 EDT on 2005-Jun-01 [Reply]