MyFourThirds.com
The Photographic Community for the Four Thirds Photographer
MyFourThirds.comPublic Folders > SmithPix > A southerly prevails

A southerly prevails

A southerly prevails
Copyright ©2005, Rob Smith HoF Win ¤ $

I walk under this tree 5 mornings a week, barring rain. Have taken quite a few shots of it but mostly with a much wider lens. Haven't been happy with any of them. This time I shot at 'normal' focal length and it works much better. The lighthouse is not so diminished in the distance with the longer zoom. Moral of the story: wider is not always better just because you can.

I used an old T32 flash to punch some light into the shadows. You can see that it's been bounced back by the reflectors on the road guide posts.

It illustrates the direction of prevailing winds at Port Macquarie. This shot is looking east.

23 September: Reposted with improved (?) sharpness.

Photographer: Rob Smith HoF Win ¤ $
Folder: SmithPix
Uploaded: 2005-Sep-21 23:46 EDT
Current Rating: 9.25/4 (Weighted rating: 8.62)
View all ratings
Delete my rating
Copying allowed: No
Camera: Olympus E-1
Lens: Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5
Lens Adapter: None
ISO: 100
Aperture: 8
Shutter Speed: 1/180
Focal Length: 27mm
Flash: Yes
Tripod/Monopod: No
Critique Level: Dead Honest Critique

Comment/Rate Critique Guideline Share this Image

NO SUBJECT

I like the bold and brash composition Rob, and the dominance of the tree reaching across the vista. I just wonder whether it could have been a tad sharper, but that could be down to my work monitor. Overall though, it's a good image.

Nice one

Andy

Andy Collin HoF Win ¤ $ at 06:08 EDT on 2005-Sep-22 [Reply]

Rob

lovely shot - I can identify with the sense of revelation that comes with using another lens - I too have often unthinkingly used a wide angle only to be disappointed with the results, and then surprised myself with what comes of narrowing the pov. I think I said to you before that i already feel that I know this lighthouse, and it's a wonderful anchor to this shot, which is of course dominated by the tree. Excellent B&W conversion as usual - the sky and the early morning light is lovely. Great stuff.

nigel harvey ¤ at 09:44 EDT on 2005-Sep-22 [Reply]

Excellent Rob

Everything excellent.

A word about the conversion. Digital cameras 'see' in monochrome and by using colour filters and software interpolation generate a false colour image. The monochrome raw data is converted to colour and you (excellently) 'converted' it back. Original monochrome is the best. Did you shoot in RAW or jpeg? OK, so there's a techy gripe about people going on about 'conversions', pedantic, but I know what they mean.

All the Best Rob.

Chris Bryant HoF ¤ at 10:04 EDT on 2005-Sep-22 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

and these white dots are the only thing that is destract a little...but these is easy to fix ...i think...Like the conversion and clouds but espec . the compo with this witness tree of strong winds there...

denis grzetic HoF Win ¤ at 14:42 EDT on 2005-Sep-22 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

I love it Rob. The tilt of the tree framing the hill and lighthouse is great and that is a very interesting sky. The use of flash makes it look a little bit surreal.

Frank Brault ¤ $ at 18:41 EDT on 2005-Sep-22 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Hi Rob,

no waves? :-)

Even without waves it is a very well done picture. Have no problem with sharpness in this one. Like the composition very much. Excellent B&W conversion.

Jochen Mues ¤ $ at 01:49 EDT on 2005-Sep-23 [Reply]

Thank you friends!

  • Andy - You were right about the sharpness. I'm sharpening gun shy at times! Have reposted. I'm pleased the composition comes across strongly, as was my intent.
  • Nigel - Great to read your comments on the lens thing. Yes, how often do I use a zoom at its maximum extents - whether wide or tele - instead of looking at the scene and asking myself what really works best. Matching the lens to the scene is more important than fitting the scene to the lens.
  • Chris - It was a surprising revelation to me when I read that digital camera CCDs capture greyscale values and then interpolate to build the full colour image. I learned of it in Bruce Fraser's 'Camera RAW with Adobe Photoshop CS' (recommended reading). I always shoot RAW and just don't buy the arguments that hi-res JPG is as useful. 16 bits beats 8 any day. However, I don't agree that 'Original monochrome is the best'. Open a RAW capture in the RAW converter and completely desaturate and you see - I think - original monochrome as captured by the CCD. In most cases I find this quite bland. Using the digital darkroom and varying channel strengths, for example, is analogous to the old b&w masters using various Wratten filters to create more pleasing b&w shots in-negative then dodging and burning under enlarger. However, the digital darkroom is much more powerful and flexible than the tools Ansel Adams, for example, worked with.
  • Steen - Glad you find it dramatic too. It was quite sharp, I just didn't let it through properly in the blow-down for Web :-)
  • Denis - I rarely disagree with you but I do today - on the white dots. Not because 'they were there' but because they add to the soul of the image for me. It's daylight and the lighthouse has gone out, but the little lights on the posts mimic the lighthouse. I like that the BG behind the posts is quite dark, allowing the reflectors to really shine. I also think they look good positioned on the same vertical third as the lighthouse. I must admit, though, that this aspect of the image was totally accidental! :-)
  • Frank - 'a little bit surreal' sounds good to me!
  • Jochen - No waves...but that tree is doing a pretty good impersonation, don't you think? Thanks for affirming the conversion. I did wonder if the clouds at left were a little too harsh. There were a couple of small blowouts that I had to stamp.

Rob Smith HoF Win ¤ $ at 04:11 EDT on 2005-Sep-23 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Hello, beautiful black and white

emme . ¤ at 07:15 EDT on 2009-Sep-04 [Reply]